Femme Fatale
[Brian De Palma, 2002]:
From the
machinations of the film noir - the influence of which is further defined by
the evocation of the title as an acknowledgement of the character's self-aware
consideration of her own persona; of the "role" that she's been chosen
to play - to the presence of the media, surveillance and the notion of life
itself as a drama, or spectacle, Femme Fatale is as much a dissertation on
viewing and the relationship that each of us have with the cinema as about this
character's own efforts to recognise the truth. The opening sequence - a long pull-back shot from
a fuzzy blued image of Wilder's Double Indemnity (1944) on the screen of a
hotel room television-set, as it eventually reveals the naked form of the
film's protagonist as a ghostly reflection (already a character lost in a world
of images) - establishes the themes of projection and self-analysis. In the next scene, this character will take
part in a daring heist. The heist itself
unfolds against the backdrop of the Cannes film festival, in which the
reactions of an audience viewing a film are intercut with the concurrent action
of De Palma's own movie; further supporting this relationship between the
audience and the work. However, it is
through the realisation of the central character that the film finds its heart.
This character, effectively a good person - a criminal, but also a
professional - makes a poor decision and, in doing so, finds her life thrown
out of balance. To find stability and to
take stock, she imagines where this life will lead her, and through engaging
with this dramaturgy as psychodrama, finds a direction, objectively, as if
distanced enough from her own life, again, like a character in a film.
The Masque of the Red Death [Roger Corman, 1964]:
In all honesty, I can't intellectualise the impact of Corman's
film. Although the narrative deals with
intelligent themes, such as the corruption of innocence, or the perseverance of
the human spirit at a time of great moral panic and unrest, the impression that
I'm left with - the thing that seems the most remarkable and exciting, on
reflection - is the presentation. The
look, the feel, the atmosphere of the film, is exquisite. Often when approaching the work of a writer like
Poe, the first instinct is to play up the darkness, the shadows, the gothic
ambience that the bleak romanticism of the text might suggest. Think of a film like The Black Cat (1934) by Edgar
G. Ulmer or the recent Poe-affiliated work of speculative fiction, The Raven
(2012), where the emphasis is on the darkness and decay. With The Masque of the Red Death, Corman
builds on the significance of colour expressive in the title, creating a lush,
vivid, perhaps even "psychedelic" phantasmagoria of vibrant yellows,
autumnal greens, cool blues and dripping deep reds. Combined with the film's production design,
which turns the castle-setting of the film's antagonist, the evil but
charismatic Prospero, into an elaborate puzzle box - where the main hall is
like a living chess board, and where the rooms blur into a series of dizzying
corridors, like the cells of a mythical labyrinth - the actual filmmaking is
nothing less than startling.
Some might argue that this is an appraisal of style over
substance, but I would disagree. The
film has plenty of substance. The
setting of the castle itself functions as a microcosm of the upper-classes,
where the decadence and debauchery stand in stark contrast to the poverty and
sickness of the lower classes; those left outside of the safety of the castle's
protective walls. The contrast between
the two worlds suggests the relationship between the "haves" and the
"have-nots"; where the exploitation of the proletariat by Prospero
and his men is indicative of the exploitation of the working (and sometimes
even the middle) classes, as seen in our own contemporary societies. The film is also about madness and about the
corruption of the soul; where Prospero is inevitably brought down by his own
greed and lust for power, and where the regime of an organisation, fuelled by a
religion (albeit, a pagan one) that stands in judgement over those deemed 'unworthy',
are brought down by a good-hearted young woman whose dedication to the ones she
loves make her impervious to this debasing influence of evil. All of these ideas are brilliantly evoked by
Corman - an intelligent filmmaker and one with something to say - but it's the
theatrical grandeur of the film that leaves the greatest impression. Its images of death and its scenes of
insanity, sacrifice and moral degradation are as powerful as anything in
Bergman's The Seventh Seal (1957), with the added benefit of that ornate, almost
"Bavaesque" approach to lighting and design.
Primer [Shane
Carruth, 2004]:
A cold film
- emotionally and intellectually - where the emphasis is on ideas.
As a presentation, the approach is detached and distant. The camera barely moves and when it does the
effect is constricting as opposed to liberating, as if the actual form of the
film is closing in on the lives of these characters, fragmenting them; pushing
them even further towards the margins, towards the edges of the scene. The approach seems like an acknowledgement of
the moral and ethical lines being crossed by these characters as their efforts
to construct this machine - this mysterious object with the potential to bend
time - gradually progresses from a simple hobby into a genuine obsession. Although never clearly stated, the
implication that the line between reality and fiction is being blurred is one possible
interpretation; as the two characters begin to see things that are in no way
scientifically plausible, but are given an added weight of believability by the
film's low-budget aesthetic and through its focus on minimalist examination. Another implication is that we're seeing the
fragments of a story recounted by an unreliable narrator. The occasional voice-over - introduced via an
unspecified telephone conversation that incriminates the viewer - as "confidant"
(or as co-conspirator) - clarifies certain facts, but also creates a feeling of
uncertainty regarding the true nature of these events.
It's a
fascinating if sometimes frustrating experience, not just for the blending of
the cerebral and the metaphysical with a kind of DIY sensibility that mirrors
the creation of the object on screen, but in the subtle way the film forces its
audience to go back and to reconsider the development of scenes, or the
chronology of certain events. It's a
disorienting approach, where scenes occur and characters change in a manner
that at first seems inconsistent; where one scene contradicts the scene that
came before, compelling the audience almost to reinterpret the order in which
these events play out. We can only begin
to make sense of things following the eventual revelation of what these
characters have been attempting, meaning that the film works best in hindsight,
like an echo of its own existence. Ultimately, what I liked best about Carruth's
film - more than its ambition or its independent spirit - was the self-reflexivity. Throughout the film, the director himself
appears as a character creating an object in his own garage,
with the assistance of friends. This
object, which has the appearance of a primitive camera, makes possible the
manipulation of time. What is a film if
not a means of sculpting in time; suspending it, collapsing days, weeks, months
or even years into a handful of hours and minutes. Much like the device that is created by the
characters herein, it allows us to move through time and space, to see the
subjective world of a character, through their eyes and our own.